Money, Money, Money

Following on from a previous blog about the Value of Certifications, we decided to see exactly what kind of actual financial difference possessing certifications made, to the average engineer.

What is the point of certifications? There are a few of important answers to that question:

  1. To gain knowledge (to do a better job for your employer)
  2. To prove competence:
    1. job security/to keep a job (prove yourself to be invaluable)
    2. to get a job, or
    3. apply for a promotion.

Being able to independently prove your technical competence can be a great help in your career. If I was applying for a job at your company and attended an interview with you and, during our conversation, I said, “I understand networking.” You probably think, “Well, can you prove it?” If I pulled out a CCIE certification (Cisco), you would probably be impressed – and might still want me to prove it with a small in-house test, but you would be much more comfortable having seen certified proof.

This is where certifications come into their own: they help get you past the HR algorithms, which are often programmed with specific “must have” keywords, and into the interview, where you can really sell yourself and your abilities. This is the same whether you are applying for a promotion, trying to laterally transfer, or seeking a new role with a new employer.

Using Robert Half Salary Reports, the following remunerations were stated for a Network Administrator, working in the United States:

Based on Robert Half Salary Reports 2018-2020

Are Industry Certifications Worth It?

Someone with a relevant certification – be it Cisco CCNA, CompTIA A+, CWNA, etc. – would be considered to have gone a long way to proving their technical competence. The certification, along with some actual work experience, in conjunction with the ability to verbalize that experience in a coherent manner, would certainly be considered in, at least, the “average” category in the table above.

If we examine the case of someone who is applying for a job as Network Administrator, who is fairly new to the industry, has very little hands on experience, but is working on their certifications, they might be looking at 76,250 as their salary… but with a certification to prove their competence, that figure might jump up by over $16,000 a year!

So, as you can see, the difference between someone new and someone with some experience and the certifications to prove their knowledge, IS significant.

In this author’s view, sitting a class for a few days and taking the exam to gain a certification is definitely worth it!

…

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

If you are looking for the best in IT Network Training then call us today at (855) 941-2121 or contact us by email today.

The post Money, Money, Money appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

By Rie Morgan • September 30, 2026
Modern Wi-Fi systems give us an impressive amount of information. Dashboards show signal strength, channel utilization, retry rates, client health scores, roaming events, application performance, access point statistics, and enough colorful graphs to make almost any troubleshooting session feel reassuringly scientific. And all of that information is useful. I’ll freely admit that most Wi-Fi problems can be investigated without immediately reaching for a packet analyzer. But “most” and “always” are very different words. There comes a point when a Wi-Fi engineer has to stop asking what the dashboard thinks happened, and start looking at what actually happened over the air. This is where packet captures enter the discussion. A packet capture is not required for every Wi-Fi problem. If an AP has lost power, you probably don’t need Wireshark to confirm your suspicions, but when the problem involves association, authentication, roaming, retries, retransmissions, connectivity, intermittent performance, or strange client behavior, packet analysis can turn speculation into evidence . Sometimes, you simply need to see the conversation, and what really happened, to resolve the issue.
By Rie Morgan • September 16, 2026
We’ve all seen it happen: someone reports that the Wi-Fi is slow. A speed test is launched. The little needle races across the screen and, a few seconds later, an impressive number appears. “See? 600 Mbps. The Wi-Fi is fine.” Case closed. Except, of course, it isn’t. A speed test can be useful. It can tell you something about the performance experienced by a device at a particular location, at a particular moment, using a particular test server and network path. What it cannot do is provide a complete diagnosis of Wi-Fi health. That distinction matters because throughput is only one part of the user experience.
By Rie Morgan • September 10, 2026
Mesh Wi-Fi has developed quite the reputation: Need coverage in the far end of the building? Mesh. Can’t get Ethernet to an access point? Mesh. Dead spot upstairs? Mesh. Need Wi-Fi in the warehouse, courtyard, annex, garage, loading dock, or that mysterious conference room where RF signals apparently go to die? Mesh. And there’s a reason for the enthusiasm. Mesh networking can be extremely useful: it can extend connectivity into places where running cable is difficult, expensive, disruptive, or simply impossible. Modern mesh systems can dynamically select paths, recover from connectivity changes, and provide remarkably capable wireless backhaul... but that doesn’t mean mesh is automatically the best architecture. Sometimes the best mesh network is the one you don’t build!