Homer and Bart and WiFi

I find myself explaining layer 1 physical spectrum analysis quite a lot these days.

Spectrum Analysis is everywhere today. There is Cisco Spectrum Expert, and CleanAir (now the chip is installed in every Enterprise Cisco AP). There is also Metageek Chanalyzer, and of course Cisco Meraki has it built in.

Identifying the different signals can be quite important to a wireless engineer in their day-to-day job.

I wanted to write this blog entry to introduce you to two of the most common signals that can be seen in the 2.4GHz and 5GHz range: DSSS and OFDM. (DSSS is 2.4GHz only, whilst OFDM operates in 2.4GHz and 5GHz.

DSSS is the mode of operation of 802.11 Prime (DSSS), and of 802.11b (HR-DSSS). OFDM is the mode of operation of 802.11a (OFDM), 802.11g (ERP-OFDM), 802.11n(HT), and 802.11ac (VHT).

So, what is an easy way to identify and remember these signals?

Well, this is where Homer and Bart (two of my favorite Simpsons characters) come into play.

Let’s imagine that Homer and Bart are up to no good (quite a common occurrence for this pair), and for some reason they have decided to hide behind a wall. Now let’s further imagine this wall is not quite tall enough to fully hide them, thus their heads are visible…

What you get is something like we see in Diagram 1

A cartoon of homer simpson and bart simpson on a graph.

DIAGRAM 1

In Diagram 1, we see two shapes, one that looks like Homer, and one that looks like Bart. Homer is effectively the shape of a DSSS transmission, and Bart is the shape of an OFDM transmission. There you have it! Easy to remember spectrum analysis.

So, taking a look at Diagram 2 below, we see again two shapes. At channel 6 we see a DSSS transmission, and at channel 11 we see an OFDM transmission.

A computer screen shows a graph that says real time fft

DIAGRAM 2: Actual Spectrum Expert Capture

 

Frequently people ask me, “Is that a “b” AP at channel 6, and a “g” AP at channel 11?” This is very important to stop and think about. These shapes actually show a “b” (or 802.11 Prime) DSSS transmission at channel 6, and a “g” ERP-OFDM transmission at channel 11. There is a lot of other information to take into account, but that is beyond the scope and intent of this article. This will be addressed in a different blog entry.

The take away is that, at channel 6, there was a “b” (or Prime) DSSS transmission and, at channel 11, there was a “g” ERP-OFDM transmission. Does that mean the AP at channel 6 is a “b” AP? Does it mean the AP at channel 6 was talking to a “b” client? The answer to both of these is maybe! All we know for sure is that there was a “b/Prime” DSSS transmission that we caught on channel 6, it could be a “b/Prime” (DSSS) AP, it could be a “g” (ERP-OFDM) AP talking to a “b/Prime” client, or it could simply be a “g” (ERP-OFDM) AP transmitting a Beacon at its lowest Basic/Mandatory speed – 1Mbps (802.11 Prime speed) that is sent out using DSSS.
So happy hunting for the “Homers” and “Barts”, and we’ll see you next month!

 

 

Blog Update Jun 2018

We all know Ekahau works really well with MetaGeek Chanalyzer, but what you may not know is the super-duper Ekahau SideKick seems to be taking over as a Spectrum Analyzer of choice, in its own right.

Will be doing more blog information on the SideKick soon…

(BTW, that last entry is from Wlan Professionals. Wlan Professionals is great community to get involved with, and is run by Keith Parsons, who is a legend in the WiFi community. They have blogs, podcasts and videos that are a great source of information. They also run great conferences throughout the year, one in the US and one in Europe. I try to attend WlanPros, Phoenix (US), every year.)

 

If you are looking to make your mark in the IT Industry, then NC-Expert offers excellent training courses aimed at relevant IT industry certifications – contact us today to get started.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #3: Strong Signal Means Great Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • July 1, 2026
We've all seen it happen: A user reports that "the Wi-Fi is terrible," so someone immediately checks the signal strength. "RSSI is -48 dBm." "Excellent." "Problem solved." Except... the user is still staring at a spinning "loading" icon. Welcome to one of the most persistent myths in wireless networking: Strong signal means great Wi-Fi. It's an easy trap to fall into because signal strength is visible. Nearly every wireless tool reports RSSI. Devices proudly display three, four, or five little bars. Coverage heatmaps glow with reassuring shades of green. Yet experienced Wi-Fi engineers know that great signal strength and great Wi-Fi are not the same thing. In fact, it’s entirely possible to have outstanding RSSI while users experience dreadful performance!

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #2: Higher Transmit Power Means Better Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • June 23, 2026
If there were a "Wi-Fi Myths Hall of Fame," this one would have its own wing! At some point in almost every Wi-Fi engineer's career, someone suggests turning up the transmit power to solve a coverage or performance problem. The logic seems sound: if a louder signal reaches farther, surely users will enjoy better Wi-Fi? Unfortunately, Wi-Fi doesn't work quite that way. The myth that higher transmit power automatically means better Wi-Fi has survived for decades because it feels intuitive. More power sounds stronger. Stronger sounds better. Yet in real-world Wi-Fi environments, increasing transmit power often creates new problems while solving very few. Let's explore why...

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #1: More Access Points Always Improve Performance

By Rie Morgan • June 18, 2026
If you've spent any time in wireless networking, you've probably heard a variation of this statement: "The Wi-Fi is slow. Let's add another AP." It's one of the most common assumptions in enterprise wireless networking. It sounds logical: more APs should mean more Wi-Fi, and more Wi-Fi should mean better performance. Right? Not always. In fact, there are many situations where adding more APs can actually make a network perform worse. For certified Wi-Fi engineers, this isn't a surprising revelation. Yet the myth continues to appear in meetings, project discussions, and troubleshooting sessions across countless organizations. Let's explore why...