Zigbee & Z-Wave (in the Home)

So, you’re excited by the idea of a Smart Home? You like the idea of motion detectors detecting you walking in and turning the lights on for you? You dream of saying things like “Alexa, turn the kitchen lights off”, “Hey Google, turn the temperature down by 1 degree”, or “Siri play ‘Game of Thrones’”?

To be able to do this, you will need Smart Home devices, and they will need to run on a protocol.

In the home environment (and, somewhat, also in Industrial IoT) BLE doesn’t seem to be the most prominent. Zigbee and Z-Wave are competing for the Smart Home (and also for Industrial – Zigbee has a large lead here).

The Smart Home is not as simple and easy as you would think. Just like VHS vs Betamax there are multiple competing standards, and vendor implementations.

What differentiates Zigbee and Z-Wave?

A blue and white z wave logo with a frequency range of 800-900 mhz

Well, firstly, Zigbee is an “open standard”, whereas Z-Wave is not. They both create a mesh, but the mesh will not interoperate between Zigbee and Z-Wave.

Z-Wave has around 10x the distance functionality over Zigbee, in a large home Z-Wave can work better. Zigbee may require a device in each room (for example) to give the same level of operational coverage. The number of mesh hops, away from the hub, is limited in Z-Wave (4), whereas Zigbee is unlimited. Zigbee also uses less power, but the power gap between Z-Wave and Zigbee is closing today. Zigbee operates in 2.4GHz (all over the world) and will be impacted by Wi-Fi and Microwave ovens. Z-Wave runs below 1GHz (Sub 1 G or S1G, actually runs on 908.42MHz in the US, may differ in other countries). Not all devices act as a “repeater” in the mesh, be aware that for the multiple hop concept to work devices must have repeater functionality. Some devices (e.g. motion and light detectors sometimes do not have repeater functionality – so they must be connected directly to the hub).

A zigbee module has a physical range of 10 to 20 meters

Which should I choose?

If you are planning on short distances, and multiple devices Zigbee is the way to go, if you are planning few devices but far apart think about Z-Wave.

Buying the right hub can allow you to choose both standards, some hubs today can operate on both. It’s generally better to stick with one standard, but some of the newer hubs will let you choose from both. Samsung SmartThings hub is a good example of one that can connect to Zigbee and Z-Wave. Some vendor implementations do require their own hub to fully operate all the features in their products.

One of the best examples of a Zigbee device, is the Phillips Hue family of products. (The latest products even have BLE built-in). Samsung have lots of devices you can connect to their SmartThings hub. The Hue series is a classic example of a family that will work with Zigbee, or with Phillips’ hub – you need the Phillips’ Hue Bridge (hub) for the extra features.

Zigbee is currently at version 3, and it uses 128-bit symmetric encryption. It can operate at around 250kbps. Details on Zigbee can be found here: https://zigbeealliance.org/

In March 2013 Z-Wave updated to Z-Wave plus, or Gen5 products. Plus/Gen5 offers greater range, longer battery life, and more channels. It is also introducing Over The Air upgrades (OTA). Plus/Gen5 offers these along with backwards compatibility with existing Z-Wave devices. Details on Z-Wave can be found here: https://z-wavealliance.org/

One thing to watch out for is that Z-Wave upgraded their security to a much higher level called S2 in 2017. Z-Wave plus doesn’t automatically mean S2 security. Make sure any products you buy support this new standard.

Amazon, Apple, Google, and the Zigbee Alliance got together in December 2019 and formed the “Connected Home over IP” project. The goal is to speed the ability to develop home products that interoperate with their platforms. More details can be found at these two links:

I just purchased some Phillips products, and some Samsung SmartThings products. Expect a blog soon with more details…

A man is giving a thumbs up while using an apple laptop

See you next time!

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #7: Roaming Problems are Always Client Problems

By Rie Morgan • July 23, 2026
Few phrases trigger a knowing smile from experienced Wi-Fi engineers quite like this one, "It's the client's fault." Someone's video call drops while walking through the office or a warehouse scanner pauses between aisles, voice handsets crackle as users move from one floor to another... then, almost immediately, someone points at the device and confidently declares, "Well... clients decide when to roam." Technically, they're correct. But, practically, that's only part of the story. Roaming is one of the most fascinating aspects of Wi-Fi because it isn't controlled by a single device or a single setting. It's a partnership between the client, the infrastructure, and the RF environment. When that partnership breaks down, blaming one side rarely tells the whole story. Let's bust another myth... Yes, Clients Make the Decision Let's start with the important truth: in almost every Wi-Fi deployment, the client device ultimately decides when to leave one AP and join another. Laptops, smartphones, tablets, barcode scanners, medical devices, and countless IoT products all use their own roaming algorithms. Some roam aggressively whereas some cling to their current AP for far too long. Others seem convinced that losing the connection entirely is preferable to switching. Every Wi-Fi engineer has encountered at least one stubborn client that appears almost “emotionally attached” to a particular AP. :) Client behavior matters, but that's not where the story ends.

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #6: A Site Survey Is Optional

By Rie Morgan • July 17, 2026
Every Wi-Fi engineer has heard some version of it, "Can't we just install the access points where the old ones were?" Or perhaps, "The floorplan looks straightforward. Let's save some time and skip the survey." Occasionally, someone even says the dangerous words, "We've done hundreds of these buildings. They're all basically the same." That's usually the point where experienced wireless engineers quietly smile, knowing that the building is about to teach everyone a valuable lesson because: buildings don't read design guides, concrete doesn't care about your deployment schedule, metal doesn't respect your project budget, and radio waves have never once agreed to cooperate, simply because everyone wanted them to. Let's talk about why a site survey isn't an optional luxury... it's one of the most valuable engineering tools available. Every Building Is Different At first glance, two office buildings may appear identical: same square footage, same number of floors, similar room layouts, yet their wireless behavior can be dramatically different: one may have reinforced concrete walls, another may contain extensive glass partitions, the warehouse may be filled with moving inventory, a hospital may have elevators, imaging equipment, and countless reflective surfaces, a manufacturing facility may contain machinery that wasn't mentioned on any floorplan, and remember: even furniture changes RF behavior! Anyone who has performed enough surveys eventually develops a healthy respect for one simple fact: the building always gets a vote, too!

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #5: Wider Channels Always Mean Better Performance

By Rie Morgan • July 13, 2026
There is something wonderfully satisfying about seeing a Wi-Fi channel get wider: twenty megahertz becomes forty. Forty becomes eighty. Eighty becomes one hundred and sixty. This begs the question: more bandwidth must mean more speed... right? Well... sometimes. Like many things in Wi-Fi engineering, the answer begins with, "It depends." The idea that wider channels always deliver better performance has become surprisingly common. It's an understandable conclusion because, in theory, wider channels can carry more data. More lanes on a highway should allow more traffic to flow. But Wi-Fi isn't driven by theory alone. The RF environment has an annoying habit of reminding us that physics always gets the final vote. Let's explore why bigger isn't always better... More Lanes... But Fewer Roads Imagine a city with only a handful of highways. If you combine four lanes into one giant superhighway, each individual vehicle might travel faster. Unfortunately, you've also eliminated several independent routes that other drivers could have used. That's exactly what happens with channel bonding: - An 80 MHz channel occupies the same spectrum as four adjacent 20 MHz channels. - A 160 MHz channel consumes eight. While you've increased the potential throughput available to one transmission, you've dramatically reduced the number of separate channels available for everyone else. In an empty environment, this is often perfectly acceptable. But, in a busy enterprise? Not so much.