Other IoT (Besides BLE)

I wanted to let you know that there are other IoT protocols out there besides BLE. We hear a lot about BLE, and last time, I wrote a lot about the operation of BLE.

This time I want to write about other alternatives. This isn’t going to be a comprehensive list but, hopefully, will give you a flavor of what is out there.

Where to start? Well let’s start with Wi-FI. Wi-Fi operates in 2.4GHz and 5GHz (and soon 6GHz, but we’ll ignore that for now). Most people don’t automatically register Wi-Fi with IoT but there are IoT devices out there that use Wi-Fi.

Most IoT protocols run on top of 802.15.4 or a variant of it. These protocols are ideal for IoT systems.

IoT protocols that use 2.4GHz include Bluetooth/BLE, Zigbee and WirelessHART. These operate in the same frequency space as 2.4GHz Wi-Fi.

We also have CBRS (private LTE) operating around 3.6 MHz.

Most of the rest of the more common protocols* operate Sub-1GHz. Usually operating around 800-900+MHz (country dependent in many cases). This is where you will find Z-Wave, LoRa, Thread, and HaLow.

Let’s have a high-level overview of WirelessHART, LoRa, Thread and HaLow.

WirelessHART operates in the 2.4GHz ISM band and is designed to be low-power and have long battery life. Used in industrial and especially refinery industries. Here is a link to a great overview of WirelessHART by my colleague and friend, Troy Martin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkoY5NF0fVY

LoRa stands for Long Range. It is designed to allow communication between 2 points (P2P) over long distances. LoRaWAN is based on LoRa and is the protocol for building a network.

Thread is a mesh-based system based on 802.15.4. It runs on IP(v6) and is designed to create device-to-device, or device-to-cloud communications. Thread builds on top of 6LowPAN, which is IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area networks.

HaLow was created by the Wi-Fi Alliance and is sometimes called Wi-Fi for IoT. It is based on 802.11ah and thus runs below 1GHz (S1G). It has low-power and long-range, penetrating walls and building due to its operation below 1GHz. It is designed to be very power efficient, running for years on coin cell-type batteries. Like other Sub-1GHz protocols the exact frequencies that HaLow runs on is region dependent.

Well there you go. Now you know more about IoT and some of the various protocols that exist to support it.

See you next time!

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

The post Other IoT (Besides BLE) appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #3: Strong Signal Means Great Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • July 1, 2026
We've all seen it happen: A user reports that "the Wi-Fi is terrible," so someone immediately checks the signal strength. "RSSI is -48 dBm." "Excellent." "Problem solved." Except... the user is still staring at a spinning "loading" icon. Welcome to one of the most persistent myths in wireless networking: Strong signal means great Wi-Fi. It's an easy trap to fall into because signal strength is visible. Nearly every wireless tool reports RSSI. Devices proudly display three, four, or five little bars. Coverage heatmaps glow with reassuring shades of green. Yet experienced Wi-Fi engineers know that great signal strength and great Wi-Fi are not the same thing. In fact, it’s entirely possible to have outstanding RSSI while users experience dreadful performance!

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #2: Higher Transmit Power Means Better Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • June 23, 2026
If there were a "Wi-Fi Myths Hall of Fame," this one would have its own wing! At some point in almost every Wi-Fi engineer's career, someone suggests turning up the transmit power to solve a coverage or performance problem. The logic seems sound: if a louder signal reaches farther, surely users will enjoy better Wi-Fi? Unfortunately, Wi-Fi doesn't work quite that way. The myth that higher transmit power automatically means better Wi-Fi has survived for decades because it feels intuitive. More power sounds stronger. Stronger sounds better. Yet in real-world Wi-Fi environments, increasing transmit power often creates new problems while solving very few. Let's explore why...

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #1: More Access Points Always Improve Performance

By Rie Morgan • June 18, 2026
If you've spent any time in wireless networking, you've probably heard a variation of this statement: "The Wi-Fi is slow. Let's add another AP." It's one of the most common assumptions in enterprise wireless networking. It sounds logical: more APs should mean more Wi-Fi, and more Wi-Fi should mean better performance. Right? Not always. In fact, there are many situations where adding more APs can actually make a network perform worse. For certified Wi-Fi engineers, this isn't a surprising revelation. Yet the myth continues to appear in meetings, project discussions, and troubleshooting sessions across countless organizations. Let's explore why...