Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy

Welcome to our April 2020 blog update where this month I want to focus on Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

You may see a lot of talk about BLE. I thought I’d write a little blog on the differences between Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

A lot of people think they are the same and related. Well they kinda are, but distant cousins – not brothers. They have a common heritage, but they have several important distinctions.

BT was created in the mid to late 1990s, from work done at Ericsson in the years previous. It was created to run over short distances and be used for things like mice and keyboards. It was designed to replace small cable runs, over short distances.

Today, in addition to mice and keyboards, you most probably have experienced in your headphones, your microphone (probably for your phone, embedded into an earpiece), or maybe even in your car.

BT breaks down into two main types of devices: BT Classic (also known as BR/EDR) and BLE.

BLE was introduced in BT v4.0 (2010) and lives up to its name – low energy/power. Both these types cannot interoperate, even though they are both technically BT, and operate in the same 2.4GHz (2.400 – 2.4835GHz) frequency. A device wishing to operate both protocols needs to run both protocols (this is sometimes called a Dual Mode device).

You may see BLE sometimes referred to as BT Smart. BLE is becoming more popular, especially because of its lower power use, and therefore longer battery life. BT was designed, and intended, for continuous data streaming, where BLE was designed for short burst data transmission. BT is used for audio streaming, and file transfers. BLE tends to be used for data transmission, and/or control with low-bandwidth applications.

Technical Details (BT v5.0 – 2016)

<<Click image to enlarge>>

BLE versions are backwards-compatible.

There you go! Lots of information on BLE, so now you can impress people at parties, right? Or maybe…?

See you next time!

===

*Speed is the speed of the PHY layer, application throughput tends to be around 70% of the stated “speed”.

**2Mbps speed involved use of new hardware. It is possible older equipment may not support this.

*** BT5.0

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

The post Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #4: If Coverage is Good, Capacity Will Be Fine

By Rie Morgan • July 8, 2026
Walk into almost any office after a new Wi-Fi deployment and you'll hear a familiar sentence: "Coverage looks great. We should be good." It sounds logical. After all, if every corner of the building has a healthy signal, surely the network can handle whatever users throw at it. Except... that's not how Wi-Fi works. Coverage and capacity are close friends, but they're definitely not twins. One answers the question, "Can devices hear the network?" The other answers, "Can everyone actually use it at the same time?" Confusing the two is one of the most common mistakes in Wi-Fi design, and it often explains why a network that looks fantastic on a heatmap still leaves users frustrated.  Let's bust this myth once and for all.

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #3: Strong Signal Means Great Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • July 1, 2026
We've all seen it happen: A user reports that "the Wi-Fi is terrible," so someone immediately checks the signal strength. "RSSI is -48 dBm." "Excellent." "Problem solved." Except... the user is still staring at a spinning "loading" icon. Welcome to one of the most persistent myths in wireless networking: Strong signal means great Wi-Fi. It's an easy trap to fall into because signal strength is visible. Nearly every wireless tool reports RSSI. Devices proudly display three, four, or five little bars. Coverage heatmaps glow with reassuring shades of green. Yet experienced Wi-Fi engineers know that great signal strength and great Wi-Fi are not the same thing. In fact, it’s entirely possible to have outstanding RSSI while users experience dreadful performance!

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #2: Higher Transmit Power Means Better Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • June 23, 2026
If there were a "Wi-Fi Myths Hall of Fame," this one would have its own wing! At some point in almost every Wi-Fi engineer's career, someone suggests turning up the transmit power to solve a coverage or performance problem. The logic seems sound: if a louder signal reaches farther, surely users will enjoy better Wi-Fi? Unfortunately, Wi-Fi doesn't work quite that way. The myth that higher transmit power automatically means better Wi-Fi has survived for decades because it feels intuitive. More power sounds stronger. Stronger sounds better. Yet in real-world Wi-Fi environments, increasing transmit power often creates new problems while solving very few. Let's explore why...