New WiFi Naming Protocol – WiFi 6

New WiFi Naming Protocol – WiFi 6

We are expecting the imminent release of a new Wireless standard based on IEEE standards 802.11ax which will simply be known as “WiFi 6”.

The hopes are that this new WiFi version will offer faster access: higher data rates, increased capacity, and overall enhanced performance.

“What is it called?” I hear you say. Well, apparently gone are the days of the complicated historical nomenclature. In order to make the highly complex terminology more accessible to us mere mortals, the WiFi Alliance has voluntarily announced its simplification of the naming protocol:

  • 802.11b to be known as Wi-Fi 1
  • 802.11a to be known as Wi-Fi 2
  • 802.11g to be known as Wi-Fi 3
  • 802.11n to be known as Wi-Fi 4
  • 802.11ac (current) to be known as Wi-Fi 5
  • 802.11ax (the new one) to be known as Wi-Fi 6

What is going to make life much easier, for those of us who are not initiated within the “inner circles” of Wireless, is that devices are to be labeled simply as “Wi-Fi x compatible” (where x indicates the compatible standard, i.e., Wi-Fi 6 for 802.11ax, etc.) by the use of simple little logos:

This will make it so much easier when purchasing WiFi-enabled hardware. Purchasers can immediately see with which standard their device is compatible.

The “high wizards” of the wireless community may not be too keen on the curtain being drawn back on their “dark magic” and the mystique surrounding the standards being simplified.

But, from a non-technical perspective, this bold move seeks to make the technology more accessible to the masses and will, in time, promote its wider use and, I am sure, ultimately give greater job security to those who are privy to the more complex inner-workings of wireless technology… because, as consumers, we are bound to mess up somehow and will need their help to fix it.

Learn More

To learn more, check out our range of  Wireless-focused IT industry certification training classes:
CWNP (Associate level) Wireless Network Administrator: CWNA
CWNP (Professional level) Wireless Network Security: CWSP
CWNP (Professional level) Wireless Network Design: CWDP
CWNP (Professional level) Wireless Network Analysis: CWAP
Cisco CCNA (Associate) level: WiFUND
Cisco CCNP (Professional) level: WiDESIGN , WiDEPLOY , WiSECURE , WiTSHOOT
Cisco CCIE (Expert) level: CIEWL1

Related Links

WLAN Association: https://wlanassociation.org/

If you are looking to advance your IT career, perhaps in Wireless, or maybe a different track, and would like to discuss your options, contact NC-Expert today!

The post New WiFi Naming Protocol – WiFi 6 appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #14: One Speed Test Tells You Everything

By Rie Morgan • September 16, 2026
We’ve all seen it happen: someone reports that the Wi-Fi is slow. A speed test is launched. The little needle races across the screen and, a few seconds later, an impressive number appears. “See? 600 Mbps. The Wi-Fi is fine.” Case closed. Except, of course, it isn’t. A speed test can be useful. It can tell you something about the performance experienced by a device at a particular location, at a particular moment, using a particular test server and network path. What it cannot do is provide a complete diagnosis of Wi-Fi health. That distinction matters because throughput is only one part of the user experience.

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #13: Mesh is ALWAYS the Best Solution

By Rie Morgan • September 10, 2026
Mesh Wi-Fi has developed quite the reputation: Need coverage in the far end of the building? Mesh. Can’t get Ethernet to an access point? Mesh. Dead spot upstairs? Mesh. Need Wi-Fi in the warehouse, courtyard, annex, garage, loading dock, or that mysterious conference room where RF signals apparently go to die? Mesh. And there’s a reason for the enthusiasm. Mesh networking can be extremely useful: it can extend connectivity into places where running cable is difficult, expensive, disruptive, or simply impossible. Modern mesh systems can dynamically select paths, recover from connectivity changes, and provide remarkably capable wireless backhaul... but that doesn’t mean mesh is automatically the best architecture. Sometimes the best mesh network is the one you don’t build!

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #12: Auto Channel Selection ALWAYS Knows Best

By Rie Morgan • August 28, 2026
Automatic Channel Selection sounds like one of those features we should simply be able to trust: the APs monitor the RF environment, the Controller gathers data, an Algorithm considers interference, utilization, neighboring APs, channel availability, and other metrics, then Radio Resource Management (RRM) does its “thing” and selects the best channels. Wonderful! One less problem for the wireless engineer to worry about... except RF rarely cooperates with anything quite that neatly! Modern RRM systems are remarkably capable, and automatic channel selection can dramatically simplify the management of large wireless environments, but an algorithm can only make decisions based on the information it collects, the parameters it has been given, and the objectives it has been designed to optimize. That makes automation a powerful engineering tool. It does not make it the engineer.